First published July 1, 2008
Received for publication October 17, 2007, and accepted in revised form May 14, 2008.
1Department of Pathology and Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, New York, New York, USA.
2Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
3Center for Dementia Research, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, Orangeburg, New York, USA.
4Pharmaceutical Research Division, Research Laboratory 1 (CNS), Mitsubishi Pharma Corporation, Nihonbashi-Honcho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
5Department of Cell Biology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Address correspondence to: Ottavio Arancio, Department of Pathology and Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the Aging Brain, Columbia University, P&S 12-420D, 630 W 168th Street, New York, New York 10032, USA. Phone: (212) 851-4617; Fax: (212) 851-4602; E-mail: email@example.com.
Calpains are calcium-dependent enzymes that determine the fate of proteins through regulated proteolytic activity. Calpains have been linked to the modulation of memory and are key to the pathogenesis of Alzheimer disease (AD). When abnormally activated, calpains can also initiate degradation of proteins essential for neuronal survival. Here we show that calpain inhibition through E64, a cysteine protease inhibitor, and the highly specific calpain inhibitor BDA-410 restored normal synaptic function both in hippocampal cultures and in hippocampal slices from the APP/PS1 mouse, an animal model of AD. Calpain inhibition also improved spatial-working memory and associative fear memory in APP/PS1 mice. These beneficial effects of the calpain inhibitors were associated with restoration of normal phosphorylation levels of the transcription factor CREB and involved redistribution of the synaptic protein synapsin I. Thus, calpain inhibition may prove useful in the alleviation of memory loss in AD.
To date, at least 14 mammalian calpains, cytosolic calcium-activated cysteine proteases, have been identified (reviewed in ref. 1). Two major forms, calpain 1 and calpain 2, also known as μ-calpain and m-calpain, have been linked to Alzheimer disease (AD) (2). Calpain 1, the form most concentrated in synapses (3), is abnormally activated in AD brain (4). Calpastatin, the endogenous inhibitor of calpains, is significantly decreased in the same neurodegenerative disorder (2). The activated form of calpain 2 is increased in neurites of neurons at risk for developing neurofibrillary pathology and is extensively bound to neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs) in brains of AD patients (5). Calpain overactivation triggered by abnormally high calcium levels and calpastatin depletion lead to limited cleavage or degradation of key neuronal proteins in AD (2, 6). Indeed, calpains modulate the trafficking and, indirectly, the proteolytic processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP), a polypeptide thought to play a fundamental role in AD (7–11). Moreover, calpains influence the phosphorylation and proteolysis of tau, another protein associated with AD (reviewed in refs. 1, 6). Other calpain substrates affected in AD include CaM-kinase IIα (CaMK-IIα) and PKC, 2 enzymes that regulate APP phosphorylation and influence its metabolism (12–14); second messenger-related enzymes such as phospholipase C-1, -2, -β3 (15), and cyclin-dependent kinase 5 (Cdk-5) (16); transcription factors such as c-Jun, c-Fos, and IκB (17, 18); and the memory-related gene, cAMP regulatory element-binding protein (CREB) (19–21). Calpains also regulate cytoskeletal proteins such as spectrin (22) and MAP2 (23) and, through direct proteolytic actions and indirect modulatory effects on several protein kinases (PKC, ERK1/2, CaMK-II, and Cdk-5/p35), play a key role in regulating the dynamic behavior and turnover of cytoskeletal proteins, especially those in synapses where calpain concentrations are high (3). Recently, calpain actions on the GluR1 subunit of AMPA receptors (24), amphiphysin I (25) and suprachiasmatic nucleus circadian oscillatory protein (26), have been shown to modulate synaptic activity and memory formation.
Growing evidence suggests that the cognitive impairment in AD starts long before neuronal death and that signaling between neurons is interrupted at early stages of the disease. The importance of synaptic alterations in AD has been confirmed by studies on transgenic mouse models of AD (27) and on amyloid-β peptide–induced (Aβ-induced) impairment of long-term potentiation (LTP), a widely studied cellular model of learning and memory (28). In this study, we examined the effect of calpain inhibition through E64, trans-epoxysuccinyl-l-leucylamido (4-guanidino)-butane, and the highly specific inhibitor BDA-410, (2S)-N-(1S)-1-[(S)-Hydroxy(3-oxo-2-phenyl-1-cyclopropen-1-yl)methyl]-2-methylpropyl-2-benzenesulfonylamino-4-methylpentanamide, on the impairment of synaptic transmission due to overexpression of mutated forms of APP (K670N,M671L) and presenilin 1 (PS1) (M146L), each of which causes familial cases of AD. We also investigated whether calpain inhibition is beneficial against abnormal spatial-working memory and associative fear memory in transgenic mice overexpressing the 2 mutated transgenes (APP/PS1 mice). Finally, we studied the effect of calpain inhibition on the phosphorylation of the memory-related molecule CREB and on the localization of the synaptic protein synapsin I.
Calpain inhibition reestablishes normal synaptic function in APP/PS1 mouse cultures. Dissociated hippocampal cell cultures are a particularly useful model for examining basal neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity (29–31). Cell cultures from transgenic animals exhibit many features observed in AD, including production of elevated levels of Aβ and synaptic dysfunction (32, 33). Thus, as a first tool for our studies, we used hippocampal cell culture preparations derived from APP/PS1 mice (34). We first confirmed results on the synaptic localization of calpains within the hippocampal neuronal cultures (3). Calpain I immunoreactivity was present in neuronal cell bodies and was punctate along neuronal processes (Figure 1A, left panel) where it colocalized with nearly all synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta (Figure 1A, right panel, yellow). These results are consistent with the idea that both proteins are localized at the synaptic level. Regions of calpain immunoreactivity that were not associated with synapsins may represent locations where the synapse is not fully formed or areas where calpains are located extrasynaptically.
The calpain inhibitor E64 reestablished normal synaptic function in APP/PS1 mouse hippocampal cultures.(A) Calpain 1 immunoreactivity colocalized with immunofluorescence for the presynaptic protein, synapsin I. Calpain 1–immunoreactive puncta (left panel). Synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta (middle panel). Colocalization of calpain-immunoreactive puncta with synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta (so that the puncta appear yellow) (right panel). Scale bar: 15 μm. (B) Western blot demonstrated that E64 annulled calpain cleavage of spectrin to its 150-kDa fragment (n = 5 per group). (C) Quantitative western blot analysis of the 150-kDa fragment showed a 32% increase in APP/PS1 cultures compared with WT cultures (n = 5 for both; P < 0.05; data normalized against α-tubulin). (D) Vehicle-treated (veh-treated) APP/PS1 cultures showed approximately 2-fold increase of spontaneous mEPSC frequency (n = 10) compared with vehicle-treated WT cultures (n = 10; P < 0.01, with 1-way ANOVA). E64 did not affect average basal mEPSC frequency in WT cultures (n = 10; P > 0.05 with t test) but reestablished normal basal frequency of spontaneous neurotransmitter release in APP/PS1 cultures (n = 6). (E) Application of glutamate no longer enhanced mEPSC frequency in cultures from vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice compared with cultures from vehicle-treated WT mice (n = 10 in APP/PS1 cultures; n = 10 in WT littermate cultures; P < 0.01 with 2-way ANOVA) without affecting mEPSC amplitude in either genotype (data not shown). Block of calpain activity through E64 ameliorated the deficit in long-lasting enhancement of synaptic transmission (n = 10; P < 0.01 compared with vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures), without affecting it in WT cultures (n = 10; P > 0.05 compared with vehicle-treated WT cultures).
We next examined whether calpains play a role in neurotransmission using the cysteine protease inhibitor E64. E64 is an irreversible, cell- and tissue-permeable inhibitor of calpain 1 and calpain 2. It is an Arg-Leu peptidomimetic with an electrophilic epoxide warhead that irreversibly modifies the active site cysteine and has been used in many studies as an inhibitor of cysteine proteases such as calpain (IC50= 0.57 ± 0.01 μM) (35–37). In preliminary experiments, we confirmed that E64 inhibits calpain cleavage of spectrin to its 150-kDa fragment in neuronal cultures, a hallmark of calpain action (Figure 1B) (22). Interestingly, levels of the calpain-generated 150-kDa fragment of spectrin were increased in APP/PS1 mouse cell cultures compared with WT cultures, suggesting that calpains are overactivated in neuronal cultures from the transgenic mice (Figure 1C).
Healthy neurons spontaneously release neurotransmitter, a phenomenon that is known as miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSCs). The analysis of mEPSC frequency and amplitude in 11- to 14-day-old cultured neurons from WT mice did not reveal any difference among vehicle-treated cultures, those that were treated with E64 (1 μM) for 3–4 days (Figure 1D), or control cultures that did not receive any treatment (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; doi:10.1172/JCI34254DS1). These results suggest that calpains do not play a role in spontaneous release of neurotransmitter. We found a significant increase in basal mEPSC frequency in vehicle-treated cultures from APP/PS1 animals (Figure 1D). In contrast, the average amplitude of mEPSCs was unchanged. In interleaved experiments, the application of E64 (1 μM) to the culture medium for 3–4 days reestablished the normal basal frequency of spontaneous neurotransmitter release in APP/PS1 mice (Figure 1D) without changing the average amplitude. These results, which we believe to be novel, are consistent with previous findings showing that synaptic transmission is impaired following overexpression of APP and PS1 (38–40). More importantly, our findings suggest that calpain inhibitors can be used to reestablish the normal basal frequency of spontaneous release of neurotransmitter in APP/PS1 mouse cultures.
Long-lasting enhancement of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus is an important manifestation of plasticity, which is thought to underlie learning and memory (28). In preliminary experiments on hippocampal cultures from APP/PS1 mice, we found that a brief application of glutamate (200 μM) did not produce the enhancement of mEPSC frequency that is seen either in cultures from WT mice treated with vehicle (Figure 1E) or in control WT cultures that did not receive any treatment (Supplemental Figure 1B). These data, which are consistent with results from slices derived from the APP/PS1 mouse (38), indicate that overexpression of these 2 transgenes inhibits the neuron’s capacity for plasticity. Therefore, in interleaved experiments, we tested whether inhibiting calpain activity with 1-μM E64 makes it possible to reestablish normal synaptic plasticity in cultures from double transgenic animals. We found that APP/PS1 cultures treated with E64 (for 3–4 days prior to recording) showed normal long-lasting enhancement of synaptic plasticity (Figure 1E). Moreover, E64-treated WT mice did not show changes in their capability for undergoing synaptic plasticity (Figure 1E). Thus, these data suggest that calpains are involved in the impairment of synaptic plasticity caused by overexpression of the APP and PS1 transgenes, and that treatment with a calpain inhibitor can rescue this impairment.
A problem frequently encountered when using calpain inhibitors is their specificity for calpains. E64 irreversibly modifies the active site cysteine of the protease (35–37). By contrast, BDA-410, (C26H32N2O5S; MW, 484.61; half-life, ~400 minutes), is a novel orally active synthetic Leu-Leu peptidomimetic with a cyclopropenone group that strongly draws toward itself the hydrogen of the –SH residues of cysteines contained in the calpain molecule (Figure 2A) (41). This leads to an intense electrostatic interaction between the resultant positively charged cyclopropenium ion and the –S– residue in calpain cysteines. BDA-410 has a potent and selective inhibitory action against calpain. Its inhibitory activities against specific proteases in SH-SY5Y cells were the following: calpain 1/calpain 2, IC50 = 21.4 nM; papain, IC50 = 400 nM; cathepsin B, IC50 = 16 μM; thrombin, IC50 > 100 μM; cathepsin G, IC50 > 100 μM; cathepsin D, IC50 = 91.2 μM; proteasome 20S, IC50 > 100 μM (42).
The highly selective calpain inhibitor BDA-410 reestablished normal basal frequency of spontaneous neurotransmitter release and rescued impairment of synaptic plasticity in APP/PS1 mouse cultures.(A) Chemical structure of BDA-410. (B) Vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures showed approximately 2-fold increase of spontaneous mEPSC frequency (n = 7) compared with vehicle-treated WT cultures (n = 8; P < 0.01 with 1-way ANOVA). BDA-410 did not affect average basal mEPSC frequency in WT cultures (n = 7) and reestablished normal basal frequency of spontaneous neurotransmitter release in APP/PS1 cultures (n = 8; P < 0.01). (C) Application of glutamate (200 μM) did not enhance mEPSC frequency in cultures from APP/PS1 mice compared with cultures from WT mice (n = 7 in APP/PS1 cultures; n = 8 in WT littermate cultures; P < 0.01 with 2-way ANOVA). mEPSC amplitude values were not affected by glutamate (data not shown). Block of calpain activity through BDA-410 was beneficial against the impairment of long-lasting enhancement of synaptic transmission (n = 8; P < 0.01 compared with vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures), without affecting it in WT cultures (P > 0.05 compared with vehicle-treated WT cultures).
To confirm the results with E64 using BDA-410, we first examined the effect of BDA-410 on basal mEPSC frequency in 11- to 14-day-old cultured neurons derived from APP/PS1 mice and WT littermates. We confirmed our previous findings that basal mEPSC frequency is increased in cultures from APP/PS1 mice compared with cultures from WT mice (Figure 2B). The average amplitude of mEPSCs was unchanged. In interleaved experiments, APP/PS1 cultures were treated with BDA-410 (50 nM) (in 0.1% DMSO). The application of BDA-410 to the culture medium for 3–4 days reestablished normal basal frequency of spontaneous neurotransmitter release in APP/PS1 mice (Figure 2B), while having no effect on the frequency of neurotransmitter release in WT cultures (Figure 2B). These results confirm the findings with E64, indicating that calpain inhibitors can be used to reestablish normal basal frequency of spontaneous release of neurotransmitter in APP/PS1 mice. Moreover, since the concentration of BDA-410 used in these experiments was very low (below the threshold of inactivation of other proteases), we have concluded that the effects of BDA-410 are specific to its inhibitory action against calpains.
To further confirm that BDA-410 can rescue changes of synaptic transmission in APP/PS1 mice, we examined the effects of the compound on glutamate-induced, long-lasting enhancement of synaptic transmission in cultured hippocampal neurons. We reproduced our previous results, showing that a brief application of glutamate (200 μM) did not produce enhancement of mEPSC frequency in cultures from APP/PS1 mice compared with cultures from WT mice (Figure 2C). A 50-nM BDA-410 exposure for 3–4 days prior to recording, however, reestablished normal synaptic plasticity in cultures from double transgenic animals (Figure 2C). BDA-410–treated WT mice did not show changes in their capability for synaptic plasticity (Figure 2C). Thus, these data confirm our results with E64 and indicate that calpains are involved in the impairment of synaptic plasticity caused by overexpression of APP and PS1 transgenes.
Calpain inhibition is beneficial against synaptic dysfunction following Aβ elevation in adult mice. The results obtained with the culture system encouraged us to validate our hypothesis in adult double transgenic mice, which have a more mature cellular network and synapse pattern than cell cultures. In a first series of experiments, we confirmed that levels of the calpain-generated 150-kDa fragment of spectrin were increased in hippocampi of adult APP/PS1 animals (Supplemental Figure 2, A and B). Then, we assessed whether E64 and BDA-410 inhibit calpain activity in mouse brains. We treated both WT and APP/PS1 mice with either E64 (6.4 mg/kg, i.p.), BDA-410 (30 mg/kg in 1% Tween80 saline in a volume equal to 5 ml/kg, per os), or vehicle for 60 days and then checked whether hippocampal calpain activity was affected. We found that the inhibitors blocked the cleavage of spectrin, indicating that both E64 and BDA-410 are able to inhibit calpain activity in the mouse brain (data not shown; n = 3 animals for each group).
We next examined the function of the connection between Shaffer collateral and pyramidal neurons from CA1 stratum radiatum using extracellularly recorded field excitatory postsynaptic potentials (fEPSPs). Both APP/PS1 and WT mice were treated with E64, BDA-410, or vehicle from the age of 2 months (when plaques are just starting to appear) to 7 months (when plaque pathology is extensive) (38). As previously shown in 7-month-old double transgenics (38), we found that basal synaptic transmission (BST) was reduced in slices from vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice compared with vehicle-treated WT littermate slices (Figure 3A). However, daily i.p. injections with E64 improved BST in APP/PS1 mice (Figure 3A). Moreover, treatment with vehicle did not affect BST in WT slices, as they showed similar values to control slices that did not receive any treatment (Supplemental Figure 3A). BST was not affected in E64-treated WT animals (Figure 3A). Next, we replicated these findings with the more specific calpain inhibitor BDA-410. This treatment leads to a concentration of approximately 24 nM in the plasma with a maximum concentration (Cmax) after per os bolus equal to 11.87 ng/ml. BDA-410 improved BST in double transgenics without affecting it in WT mice (Figure 3B). Thus, these findings with BDA-410 confirm the results obtained with E64.
Calpain inhibition reestablished normal synaptic function following Aβ elevation.(A) E64 improved BST at the CA3-CA1 connection of hippocampal slices from 7-month-old APP/PS1 mice treated for 5 months (10 slices from 9 E64-treated APP/PS1 mice, 7 slices from 7 vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice, 8 slices from 8 vehicle-treated WT mice; P < 0.01 comparing E64- and vehicle-treated APP/PS1 slices with 2-way ANOVA). BST was not affected in E64-treated WT animals (6 slices from 6 mice; P > 0.05). (B) BDA-410 reestablished normal BST in APP/PS1 mice treated with inhibitor between 8 weeks and 7 months of age (7 slices from 7 BDA-410–treated APP/PS1 mice, 9 slices from 8 vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice, 8 slices from 7 vehicle-treated WT mice; P < 0.01 comparing BDA-410– and vehicle-treated APP/PS1 slices). BDA-410 did not affect BST in WT littermates (11 slices from 9 mice; P > 0.05). (C) E64 was beneficial against LTP impairment at the same synapses as in A (vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice versus vehicle-treated WT mice, P < 0.01 with 2-way ANOVA; E64-treated APP/PS1 mice versus vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice, P < 0.01). The inhibitor did not affect LTP in WT mice (P > 0.05). (D) BDA-410 reestablished normal LTP in APP/PS1 mice treated between 8 weeks and 7 months of age (BDA-410–treated APP/PS1 mice versus vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice; P < 0.01; same synapses as in B). BDA-410 did not affect LTP in WT littermates (P > 0.05). (E) BDA-410 reestablished normal LTP in APP mice treated between 8 and 11 to 12 months of age (P < 0.05 in 6 slices from 6 BDA-410–treated APP mice versus 7 slices from 7 vehicle-treated APP mice; 7 slices from 7 vehicle-treated WT littermates). BDA-410 did not affect LTP in slices from WT littermates (7 slices from 7 mice; P > 0.05). BST did not vary among the 4 groups of mice (data not shown). (F) BDA-410 reestablished normal LTP in Aβ42-perfused slices (6 slices treated with BDA-410 plus Aβ versus 8 Aβ-treated slices, P < 0.05; 6 vehicle-treated slices versus 7 BDA-410–treated slices). The bar indicates the perfusion with Aβ42.
We next tested the effect of calpain inhibition on the impairment of synaptic plasticity at the Shaffer collateral-CA1 connection of APP/PS1 mice. As previously shown (38), LTP was more severely affected in vehicle-treated double transgenic mice compared with vehicle-treated WT animals (Figure 3, C and D). Moreover, treatment with vehicle did not affect LTP in WT slices, as they showed a similar degree of potentiation as did the control slices that did not receive any treatment (Supplemental Figure 3B). Impairment of LTP was dramatically improved in APP/PS1 slices following treatment with E64 or BDA-410, whereas the inhibitors did not modify LTP in slices from WT littermates (Figure 3, C and D). These findings indicate that calpain inhibition improves synaptic dysfunction in APP/PS1 mice.
PS1 mutations have been reported to increase calpain activity (43). Given that single transgenic PS1 mice have normal synaptic function whereas single transgenic APP mice show a reduction in LTP (38), we speculated that the beneficial effect of calpain inhibition on the impairment of synaptic plasticity is through an action against the consequences of APP overexpression. To directly address this hypothesis, we treated APP mice with BDA-410 for 3 months and found that the treatment reestablished normal LTP in 11- to 12-month-old APP mice compared with vehicle-treated APP littermates (Figure 3E). Thus, it is likely that this mutant form of APP plays a critical role in altering calpain activation and subsequently leading to changes in synaptic plasticity.
The APP and PS1 transgenes could affect neuronal function through a number of different mechanisms (44, 45), including direct effects by Aβ. The trafficking and signaling properties of the full-length form of APP and its natural cleavage products are likely different, which could impact aspects of synaptic function differently. To separate Aβ effects from other effects of APP and PS1 overexpression, we determined whether Aβ per se was responsible for the deficits observed in our studies on transgenic mice. We tested whether application of Aβ42 to WT slices was capable of reproducing the results obtained from transgenic mice. Since it has already been described that natural oligomers of human Aβ, in the absence of monomers and fibrils, markedly inhibit LTP in vivo (46), we applied 200-nM oligomeric Aβ42 concurrently with BDA-410 (100 nM) for 20 minutes to WT slices prior to inducing LTP. We confirmed that oligomeric Aβ42 inhibited LTP and found that BDA-410 reestablished normal LTP in Aβ-treated slices (Figure 3F). Collectively, these experiments demonstrate that calpain inhibition can rescue the damage to synaptic plasticity caused by oligomeric forms of Aβ.
Calpain inhibition is beneficial against cognitive loss in APP/PS1 mice. Plastic changes occurring at the synaptic level in the hippocampus are thought to underlie spatial learning. Memory loss is the most striking and well-known symptom of AD. Indeed, a major goal of a therapeutic agent against AD is to block or at least to alleviate memory decline. Thus, we ascertained whether treatment with calpain inhibitors could reverse or reduce the spatial learning impairment in APP/PS1 mice. In a series of experiments, we tested whether E64 is capable of reestablishing normal spatial memory in double transgenic animals. Both WT and APP/PS1 mice were i.p. injected with 6.4-mg/kg E64 or vehicle between 8 weeks and 7 months of age. At 7 months, APP/PS1 animals that had been injected with vehicle exhibited severe abnormalities in their spatial-working memory, as determined by radial-arm water maze (RAWM) testing (Figure 4A). Daily, i.p. injections of E64 improved the behavioral performance of the double transgenic mice (Figure 4A). Treatment with E64 did not affect the performance of WT mice (Figure 4A). Vehicle-treated WT mice had similar performance as control untreated WT mice (data not shown). We obtained similar results when we treated with BDA-410 (30 mg/kg in 1% Tween80 saline, in a volume equal to 5 ml/kg, per os, treated daily from 8 weeks to 7 months of age; Figure 4B). To test for visual, motor, and motivational deficits, E64-, BDA-410–, and vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice and WT littermates, as well as untreated WT mice, underwent visible platform task after performing the RAWM test. We found no difference in speed and latency period to the platform for the various groups of mice (data not shown). These data indicate that calpain inhibition is capable of reestablishing normal spatial-working memory in APP/PS1 mice.
Calpain inhibition reestablished normal spatial-working memory and associative fear memory in APP/PS1 mice.(A) In RAWM testing APP/PS1 mice treated with E64 for 5 months from 8 weeks of age made the same number of errors on the fourth acquisition (A4) and fifth retention trial (R) as vehicle-treated WT mice (n = 13; P < 0.05 compared with vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice with 2-way ANOVA; planned comparisons at trial A4, P < 0.05, and trial R, P < 0.01), whereas vehicle-treated double transgenics made more errors than vehicle-treated WT mice (n = 7; P < 0.01 compared with vehicle-treated WT mice). E64 did not affect the performance of WT mice (n = 5; P > 0.05 compared with vehicle-treated WT mice). Visible platform task did not show any sensory-motor or motivational impairment in the same animals (data not shown). (B) BDA-410 reestablished normal spatial-working memory in APP/PS1 mice following 5 months of treatment from 8 weeks of age. BDA-410–treated double transgenics (n = 12) showed similar performance in the RAWM test as vehicle-treated WT littermates (n = 12), whereas vehicle-treated double transgenic mice (n = 11) showed abnormal learning and memory (P < 0.05 in BDA-410–treated APP/PS1 mice compared with vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice; planned comparisons showed that the 2 groups were significantly different at trial A4, P < 0.05, and trial R, P < 0.01). The inhibitor did not affect the performance of WT mice (n = 14; P > 0.05 compared with vehicle-treated WT mice). The visible platform task did not show any sensory-motor or motivational impairment in all groups (data not shown). (C) BDA-410 reestablished normal contextual learning in APP/PS1 mice following 5 months of treatment from 8 weeks of age (P < 0.01 compared with vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice). The inhibitor did not affect the performance of WT mice (P > 0.05).
Another cognitive test that has been used in AD animal models is the fear-conditioning, associative learning paradigm. We first examined contextual fear learning, a hippocampus-dependent task, then we tested cued fear learning, a hippocampus-independent task. APP/PS1 and WT littermates treated with either vehicle or BDA-410 between the eighth week and the seventh month of age were subjected to a standard fear-conditioning paradigm. The mice had to associate a neutral stimulus with an aversive one. They were placed in a new context (fear-conditioning box) and exposed to a conditional stimulus (CS), i.e., a white noise cue, paired with an unconditional stimulus (US), i.e., a mild foot shock. Fear learning was assessed 24 hours later by measuring freezing behavior in response to presentation of the context (contextual conditioning) or of the auditory cue within a completely different context (cued conditioning). We found no difference in the freezing behavior of the vehicle-treated and BDA-410–treated APP/PS1 mice compared with vehicle-treated and BDA-410–treated WT littermates during the training phase of the fear-conditioning testing (data not shown). Twenty-four hours later we found decreased freezing behavior in vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice compared with vehicle-treated WT littermates in the analysis of contextual learning (Figure 4C). However, treatment with BDA-410 reestablished normal freezing in APP/PS1 mice and did not affect the performance of WT mice (Figure 4C). Treatment with vehicle did not affect the performance of WT mice as they showed similar freezing time as control untreated WT mice (data not shown). We did not find a difference in freezing behavior during cued learning (data not shown). These results indicate that the impairment in contextual fear learning in APP/PS1 mice can be rescued by treatment with a calpain inhibitor.
Next, we examined whether the beneficial effects of calpain inhibition are through an action against the negative effects of APP overexpression. Similar to synaptic plasticity, we found that treatment with BDA-410 for 3 months was capable of reestablishing normal spatial-working memory and associative memory in 11- to 12-month-old APP mice (Supplemental Figure 4, A and B). Thus, it is likely that the expression of mutant APP plays a critical role in inducing calpain activation, leading to subsequent memory loss.
Calpain inhibition does not alter Aβ levels. Given that Aβ elevation is a hallmark of AD, we tested whether inhibiting calpain activity influences Aβ levels. ELISA analysis of Aβ40 and Aβ42 revealed readily quantifiable levels of these peptides in APP/PS1 neuronal culture medium 10 days after plating (Supplemental Figure 5A). Medium of cultures from WT mice did not show detectable values for either Aβ40 or Aβ42. In interleaved experiments, we further observed that treating cultures from APP/PS1 mice for 3–4 days with E64 or BDA-410 had no effects on levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 (Supplemental Figure 5A). As an additional test, we examined blood levels and formic acid–extractable brain levels of Aβ40 and Aβ42 (representing the soluble and insoluble pools of these peptides) following 5-month treatment with either E64, BDA-410, or vehicle in double transgenic mice and their WT littermates. At 7 months, vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice showed high levels of Aβ (Supplemental Figure 5, B and C), whereas WT littermates had undetectable levels. Daily treatment with E64 or BDA-410 between the eighth week and seventh month did not reduce brain or blood levels of Aβ (Supplemental Figure 5, B and C). We also analyzed whether the inhibitors were capable of reducing plaque load. We did not find a reduction in the area occupied by plaques in either hippocampus or cortex by immunohistochemistry with the monoclonal antibody 4G8, which stains both fibrillar and diffuse Aβ (Supplemental Figure 5D), or by staining with Congo red to analyze compact deposits (Supplemental Figure 5E). No Aβ deposition (as assessed with either the 4G8 antibody or Congo red) was detected in WT mice. Collectively, these data support the hypothesis that calpain inhibitors enhance cognition without affecting amyloid levels.
The effect of calpain inhibition is mediated by CREB phosphorylation. Studies on cell cultures and slices after exogenous application of Aβ42, as well as data on amyloid-depositing transgenic animal models, have shown a decrease in phosphorylation of a transcriptional mediator of synaptic plasticity and a key molecule in memory processes, the CREB protein (19, 20, 47–49). Given that calpains might downregulate phosphorylation of CREB (21, 50), we investigated whether calpain inhibitors act on CREB phosphorylation during synaptic plasticity. We found that, unlike vehicle-treated or non-treated WT cultures (data not shown), both of which showed an increase in phosphorylated CREB (pCREB) in response to glutamate (200 μM, 5 minutes), cultures from vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice did not show this increase in CREB phosphorylation (Figure 5, A and B). These results are consistent with previously reported findings using exogenous application of Aβ (19). However, either E64 (1 μM) or BDA-410 (50 nM) applied daily for 3 days to 5-day-old cultures reestablished the glutamate-induced increase in CREB phosphorylation in APP/PS1 cultures without affecting phosphorylation in WT cultures (Figure 5, A and B). Moreover, neither E64 nor BDA-410 affected basal pCREB levels in WT or APP/PS1 cultures (data not shown). Consistent with these findings, APP/PS1 slices did not show the increase in pCREB induced by θ burst, as seen with an antibody specific to phosphoserine 133 in both vehicle- and non-treated WT slices. This inhibition was reversed in slices from mice that had been treated with either E64 or BDA-410 but not with vehicle (Figure 5, C and D). The inhibitors did not affect basal CREB phosphorylation in either WT or APP/PS1 slices (data not shown). Collectively, these data strongly support the possibility that calpain inhibitors act by reestablishing the increase in pCREB, thus rescuing the impairment of synaptic plasticity caused by overexpression of the APP and PS1 transgenes.
Calpain inhibition reestablished the increase in CREB phosphorylation during synaptic plasticity in APP/PS1 mice and produced a normal distribution of the synaptic protein synapsin I.(A) Western blot for pCREB at Ser-133 from cultured hippocampal neurons after 5-minute glutamate treatment. Five-day-old cultures were either treated with vehicle, E64, or BDA-410 for 3 days prior to applying glutamate. (B) Quantitative western blot analysis of data shown in A. pCREB levels in vehicle-treated WT cultures were increased after glutamate (n = 11; P < 0.01). APP/PS1 cultures failed to present the pCREB increase (n = 7; P > 0.01 with 1-way ANOVA). However, both E64 and BDA-410 reestablished normal pCREB values (n = 5 and 8, respectively). E64 and BDA-410 did not affect phosphorylation in WT cultures (n = 5 and 7, respectively). All samples were normalized against α-tubulin. (C) Examples of hippocampal slices stained with a pCREB antibody and fixed 60 minutes after tetanus in WT and APP/PS1 animals treated for 5 months from 8 weeks of age with E64, BDA-410, or vehicle. Lower-power (original magnification, ×4) view of the entire slice (left and middle panels). Higher-power (original magnification, ×16) view of CA1 cell pyramidal area (right panels). (D) Plot showing blockade of CA1-pCREB increase after tetanus in APP/PS1 slices (n = 6 both for WT and APP/PS1 slices; P < 0.01), whereas treatment with both E64 and BDA-410 for 5 months from 8 weeks of age reestablished the tetanus-induced pCREB increase (n = 6 for both; P < 0.01 compared with tetanized slices from vehicle-treated APP/PS1 mice). Both E64 and BDA-410 had no effect on WT mice after tetanus (n = 6 for both). In the absence of theta-burst, neither E64 nor BDA-410 induced changes in WT or APP/PS1 mice (n = 4 for each group; data not shown). IF, immunofluorescence. (E) The number of synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta was increased in vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures (n = 6) compared with vehicle-treated WT cultures (n = 6; P < 0.01). However, the basal synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta number was normal after exposure to E64 (n = 7) or BDA-410 (n = 5). The inhibitors did not affect synapsin I immunoreactivity in WT cultures (E64, n = 6; BDA-410, n = 7; P < 0.01 for both compared with vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures). (F) Glutamate failed to increase synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta numbers in vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures (n = 8) compared with vehicle-treated WT cultures (n = 7, P < 0.01), whereas both E64 and BDA-410 reestablished the glutamate-induced immunoreactivity increase in transgenic cultures (E64, n = 9; BDA-410, n = 9; P < 0.01 for both compared with vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures). Both E64 and BDA-410 had no effect on glutamate-induced immunoreactivity increase in WT cultures (E64, n = 9; BDA-410, n = 8).
Calpain inhibition restores distribution of the synaptic protein, synapsin I. Cell cultures permit visualization of changes in the distribution of synaptic protein during plasticity. Glutamate has been found to produce a long-lasting increase in the number of immunoreactive clusters, or puncta, of the synaptic protein synapsin I, as well as other synaptic proteins such as synaptophysin, α-synuclein, GluR1, and PSD95, suggesting that a series of coordinated microstructural changes in protein distribution occurs at the synaptic level during plasticity, in which redistribution of synapsin I is an integral component (51, 52). Moreover, consistent with findings on changes of mEPSC frequency in APP/PS1 cultures, overexpression of the 2 transgenes has been associated with an increase in the basal number of synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta, together with a block of the glutamate-induced increase in their number (32). Therefore, to further elucidate the beneficial effect of calpain inhibition at the synaptic level, we examined synapsin I immunoreactivity in APP/PS1 cultures in the presence of the calpain inhibitors, both in basal conditions and during synaptic plasticity. As previously described (32), we found an increase in the number of synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta in vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures compared with WT cultures either treated with vehicle (Figure 5E) or not treated (data not shown). Exposure to E64 (1 μM) or BDA-410 (50 nM) for 3–4 days reestablished the normal number of synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta in cultures from double transgenic mice (Figure 5E). Treatment with the inhibitors did not affect levels of synapsin I immunoreactivity in WT cultures (Figure 5E). Moreover, when we examined the glutamate-induced increase in the number of synapsin I–immunoreactive puncta (52), we found that application of the excitatory amino acid (200 μM in 0 Mg2+ saline for approximately 1 minute) failed to increase the number of puncta in vehicle-treated APP/PS1 cultures, whereas it increased number of puncta in both E64- and BDA-410–treated APP/PS1 cultures as well as in vehicle-treated WT cultures (Figure 5F) and control cultures that did not receive any treatment (data not shown). The 2 inhibitors did not affect the glutamate-induced immunoreactivity increase in WT cultures (Figure 5F). Taken together, these findings suggest that calpain inhibition reestablishes normal distribution of synaptic protein both in basal conditions and during plasticity.
In this study, we have demonstrated that the abnormal synaptic function and memory in APP/PS1 mice are largely reversed by either of 2 calpain inhibitors, E64 and BDA-410. To explain our results, we have proposed the working hypothesis illustrated in Figure 6. Upon binding with a putative membrane receptor, Aβ activates a molecular cascade that leads to calpain activation and degradation of important proteins involved in synaptic plasticity and learning and memory. Among the consequences of this proteolysis, there is the decreased phosphorylation or increased degradation of the transcription factor CREB, resulting in a failure to maintain transcription, ultimately leading to synaptic dysfunction and cognitive abnormalities.
Working hypothesis on how calpain inhibitors (Calp-inh) may be able to improve synaptic dysfunction.(A) Aβ activates a molecular cascade that leads to calpain activation and degradation of enzymes and structural proteins that are involved in learning and memory. Among the consequences of calpain activation, the transcription factor CREB cannot be phosphorylated and initiate transcription. (B) Calpain inhibition blocks the calcium-induced activation of calpain, preventing structural signaling alterations and allowing the phosphorylation of CREB.
Calpains are at the crossroad between physiology and pathology (2, 53). Normal calpain activation plays a role in key signaling processes. Abnormal calpain activation, in turn, is responsible for the degradation of most of the cellular protein pool, including signaling proteins, transcription factors, and cytoskeletal substrates. Given that Ca2+ is elevated in AD brains (54), it is likely that loss of Ca2+ homeostasis disrupts physiological processes that regulate calpain activity in cells, leading to dysregulation of calpain activity. Consistent with this scenario, autolysis of calpain 1 to its 76- and 78-kDa forms is enhanced in brains of AD patients (4), calpain 2 levels are increased in brains from AD patients (5, 55), and finally, levels of the endogenous inhibitor calpastatin are decreased (56).
The results obtained with E64 strongly support the hypotheses that inhibition of calpains might rescue changes of synaptic transmission and improve cognitive function in AD models. These observations are in agreement with data showing that the cysteine protease inhibitor leupeptin improves basal synaptic function in cell cultures from APP/PS1 mice (57). They are also in agreement with the finding that Aβ-induced Ca2+ influx leads to the degradation of dynamin 1, a synaptic protein involved in endocytosis, via calpain activation (58). However, although E64 is a highly specific calpain inhibitor, the compound might have rescued changes of synaptic transmission and memory through inhibitory actions on other cysteine proteases. The consequence of such lack of specificity would have been the failure of BDA-410, a more powerful and specific calpain inhibitor, to improve synaptic transmission and cognition in the APP/PS1 mice. However, we have been able to demonstrate that BDA-410 is capable of improving basal neurotransmission, synaptic plasticity, as well as spatial-working memory and contextual learning following overexpression of mutated APP and PS1 transgenes. These findings are particularly relevant in light of the observations that synaptic alterations are highly correlated with the severity of clinical dementia, whereas other important pathologies in the disease, such as senile plaques and neurofibrillary tangles, are associated to a lesser extent (59).
Studies on AD mouse models and on slices exposed to sublethal levels of Aβ42 have shown reduced levels of pCREB, a transcriptional mediator of LTP and memory (19, 20, 47, 49). Interestingly, analysis of the molecular mechanisms between aberrant APP metabolism and reductions of pCREB revealed an elevated calpain activity (21). Calpain inhibitors, in turn, reestablished normal pCREB levels (21). Consistent with these data, we have found that both E64 and BDA-410 reestablish normal levels of pCREB in a cell culture system and in slice preparations.
Another finding from our studies was the absence of changes in Aβ levels following application of calpain inhibitors. This finding is consistent with our working hypothesis that places calpain activation downstream from Aβ binding to cellular targets and ultimately affects CREB phosphorylation (49). While not affecting total Aβ levels, the inhibition of calpains may exert worthwhile therapeutic effects in AD by blocking the calpain-initiated cascades induced by both Aβ and other AD risk factors that converge on calpains. Nonetheless, it has been reported that calpains are involved in trafficking and, indirectly, processing of APP (7–11). Changes in a soluble pool of Aβ (60), in aggregation state of nondeposited Aβ, or in the intraneuronal Aβ pool (40, 61, 62) that could not be detected because of the accelerated phenotype of the APP/PS1 mice used in the present experiments might have also contributed to the beneficial effects of the 2 calpain inhibitors. Thus, the effect of both E64 and BDA-410 that we report here represents a potentially important mechanism for improving synaptic and memory deficits produced by Aβ.
The physiological roles of calpains might be a source of concern, with drugs reducing calpain activity because inhibition might affect the physiological function of calpains, and cause adverse side effects. This seems less likely in view of studies on genetically modified mice overexpressing the endogenous inhibitor calpastatin, which show normal cytoskeletal components and synaptic markers as well as development, fertility, morphology, motility, and life span in normal conditions (63). Most tellingly, we saw no effect of E64 and BDA-410 on synaptic function, cognitive behavior, and locomotion in the WT mice used in our experiments. Indeed, calpains are likely to cleave polypeptides at a limited number of sites, leaving large, often catalytically active fragments (53). Thus, it is likely that calpains have a regulatory or signaling function in cells rather than a digestive function such as the lysosomal proteases, and therefore, undesired side effects by calpain inhibitors might be limited.
The results obtained with these studies support a new possible therapeutic strategy for AD based on modulating calpain actions. The calpain family of proteases constitutes a system that has not yet been extensively exploited in the therapy of AD, although mounting evidence supports an early activation of calpains in vulnerable brain regions in AD (2, 64). Since synaptic changes are highly correlated with the severity of clinical dementia (59), protecting against synaptic disruption through calpain inhibitors may be expected to stop or slow down memory impairment in AD and other neurodegenerative disorders characterized by abnormal amyloid production.
Animals. All experiments were performed with approval of the Columbia University Animal Care and Use Committee in accordance with the guidelines for the humane treatment of animals (NIH–Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Revised 2002). The animals used for generating cell cultures consisted of double transgenic mice expressing both the human APP mutation (K670N,M671L), and the human PS1 mutation (M146L) (line 6.2), as well as their WT littermates. They were obtained by crossing APP with PS1 animals. To identify the genotype of the animals, we used the polymerase chain reaction on samples of the tail taken after the dissection of the hippocampus (57, 65, 66).
Cell cultures. Primary cultures were prepared from 1-day-old mouse pups (67). Cells were dissociated through enzymatic treatment (0.25% trypsin) and subsequent trituration. Hippocampal cells were grown in medium containing 84% MEM, supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 45 mM glucose, 1% MEM vitamin solution, and 2 mM glutamine. After 24 hours, this medium was replaced by a medium containing 96.5% Neurobasal A, 2% B27-nutrient, 1% heat-inactivated fetal calf serum, 0.4 mM glutamine, and 6.6 ng/ml 5-fluorodioxyuridine in 16.4 ng/ml uridine to suppress cell division. To prevent the induction of plasticity by spontaneous synaptic activity, kynurenic acid (0.5 mM) was also included in the culture medium.
Immunocytochemistry. As previously described (51), cultures were incubated with 2 primary antibodies overnight at 4°C: mouse monoclonal anti-calpain 1 (diluted 1:50; Chemicon International) and affinity-purified rabbit anti-synapsin I (diluted 1:200; Molecular Probes). The secondary antibodies were goat anti-rabbit labeled with Rhodamine Red and goat anti-mouse, labeled with Alexa Fluor 488 (diluted 1:500) in 4% goat serum in PBS at room temperature for 1 hour.
Western blot analysis. For assessment of calpain cleavage of spectrin in cell cultures, medium was removed and the attached cells were washed with TBS/EDTA twice. The cultured cells were subsequently harvested and homogenized in ice-cold buffer, consisting of 1 mM EGTA, 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 200 μg/ml leupeptin, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF, 2 μg/ml DNAase I, 20 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.4, and 150 mM NaCl. Protein amounts of samples were determined by using the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay. Equal amounts of protein (25 μg) were loaded on each lane of the SDS/PAGE gel (4%–20% [wt/vol] acrylamide), run with tris-tricine running buffer system, and transferred to PVDF membrane with a wet electrotransferring unit. The blots were probed for α-tubulin as the internal standard control, stripped and reprobed with anti α-spectrin (1:1,000) (MAB1622 nonerythroid; Chemicon), and membrane was exposed to alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse (1:7,500) secondary antibodies. Detection was carried out using chemiluminescent substrate for alkaline phosphatase (CDP star) and exposure of the membrane to x-ray film.
For assessment of calpain cleavage of spectrin on mice, the animals were perfused with PBS, and brains were dissected and homogenized in ice-cold buffer, consisting of 1% SDS, 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, 10 μg/ml aprotinin, 1 mM PMSF, 2 μg/ml DNAase I, 20 mM Tris-HCL, pH 7.4, and 150 mM NaCl. A concern with these experiments is that calpains are hyperactivated during the removal of the brain or after its removal for abnormal elevation of calcium levels. To avoid these problems, calpain activity was rapidly blocked by adding the calpain inhibitor, leupeptin (200 μg/ml), and by chelating calcium with EDTA (5 mM), before homogenizing the tissue. The samples were centrifuged at 18,000 g for 30 minutes. Protein concentrations were determined by BCA protein assay kit (Pierce). Equal amounts of protein (15 μg) were loaded on each lane of the SDS/PAGE gel (4%–15% gradient), run with tris-glycine running buffer system, and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane. The blots were probed for α-tubulin as the internal standard control, stripped and reprobed with anti–α-spectrin (1:1,000) (MAB1622; Chemicon), and membrane was exposed to alkaline phosphatase-conjugated anti-mouse (1:12,500) secondary antibodies. Detection was carried out using chemiluminescent substrate for alkaline phosphatase (CDP star) and exposure of the membrane to x-ray film.
For assessment of pCREB in cultures, cultures were washed twice with normal saline bath solution. Cells were exposed to glutamate (200 μM) in Mg2+ free bath solution for 5 minutes. After 20 minutes, cells were harvested and homogenized in 100 μl of ice-cold buffer, consisting of 25 mM sodium phosphate buffer, 1% SDS, 5 mM EDTA, and 1 mM PMSF. Protein concentrations were determined by BCA protein assay kit (Pierce), and equal amounts of protein (15 μg) were loaded on the 4%–20% SDS/PAGE gel (Invitrogen). The blots were probed for rabbit polyclonal anti-pCREB (1:1,000; Upstate Biotech.) and mouse monoclonal anti–β-tubulin (1:500; Sigma-Aldrich). Detection was performed using HRP-conjugated secondary antibodies (Pierce).
Electrophysiology. Cultured neurons were voltage clamped with the whole cell ruptured patch technique throughout the experiment. The bath solution consisted of the following: 119 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 20 mM HEPES, 2 mM CaCl2, 2 mM MgCl2, 30 mM glucose, 0.001 mM glycine, and picrotoxin, 0.1 mM, pH 7.3, and osmolarity was adjusted to 330 mOsm with sucrose. The solution in the whole cell patch electrode consisted of the following: 130 mM K-gluconate, 10 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 0.6 mM EGTA, 5 mM HEPES, 0.06 mM CaCl2, 2 mM Mg-ATP, 0.2 mM GTP, 0.2 mM leupeptin, 20 mM phosphocreatine, and 50 U/ml creatine-phosphokinase. Currents were recorded with a Warner amplifier (model PC-501A) and filtered at 1 kHz. In order to eliminate artifacts due to variation of the seal properties, the access resistance was monitored for constancy throughout all experiments. In order to suppress action potentials, 1 μM tetrodotoxin was added to the bath when recording mEPSCs. They were digitized and analyzed with the mini analysis program (version 4.0) from Synaptosoft Inc.
Slice recordings were performed as described previously (49). Briefly, 400-μm slices were cut with a tissue chopper and maintained in an interface chamber at 29°C for 90 minutes prior to recording. CA1 fEPSPs were recorded by placing both the stimulating and the recording electrodes in CA1 stratum radiatum. BST was assayed either by plotting the stimulus voltages against slopes of fEPSP or by plotting the peak amplitude of the fiber volley against the slope of the fEPSP. For LTP experiments, a 15-minute baseline was recorded every minute at an intensity that evokes a response approximately 35% of the maximum evoked response. LTP was induced using θ-burst stimulation (4 pulses at 100 Hz, with the bursts repeated at 5 Hz, and each tetanus including 3 ten-burst trains separated by 15 seconds).
Aβ preparation. Oligomeric Aβ42 was prepared as previously described (20). Briefly, the lyophilized peptide (American Peptide) was resuspended in 100% 1,1,1,3,3,3-hexafluoro-2-propanol (HFIP; Sigma-Aldrich), and HFIP was allowed to evaporate in a fume hood. The resulting clear peptide films were stored at –20°C. Twenty-four hours prior to use, the aliquots were added to DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich) and sonicated for 10 minutes. Oligomeric Aβ42 was obtained by diluting an aliquot of Aβ42-DMSO solution with a small volume of normal recording bath solution, vortexing for 30 seconds, and then incubating at 4°C for 16 hours. This synthetic Aβ has been characterized both biochemically and electrophysiologically, showing similar biological effects at low nanomolar concentrations as naturally secreted oligomers of Aβ (69). In addition, its normal sequence — but not a scrambled sequence — is known to block LTP immediately and consistently (20).
Behavioral studies. Assessments of both spatial-working memory through the RAWM and associative memory through analysis of contextual and cued conditioning have been previously described (see Supplemental Methods) (49).
Aβ measurement. For cell cultures, supernatant derived from the medium collected from the culture dishes were spun at 2,500 g for 5 minutes at 4°C. For adult mice, hemibrains were frozen at –80°C, homogenized in sucrose buffer, and extracted in formic acid as previously described (70). Blood was harvested in a tube containing 10 mM EDTA, centrifuged at 2,000 g for 5 minutes at 4°C, and plasma was stored at –80°C before loading onto ELISA plates. Human Aβ levels were measured through ELISA, in which Aβ was trapped with either a monoclonal antibody specific for Aβ40 (JRF/cAβ40/10) or one specific for Aβ42 (JRF/cAβ42/26), and then detected with a monoclonal antibody specific for whole Aβ (JRF/Aβtot/17) conjugated to horseradish peroxidase as previously described (71).
Plaque measurement. The method for evaluation of plaque load has been previously described (38). Briefly, immunostaining for plaques containing both fibrillar and diffuse Aβ was performed with monoclonal 4G8 antibodies (Signet Laboratories). The specificity of immunoreactivity was confirmed by checking that no signal was detected when the primary antibody was omitted. Secondary antibodies consisted of biotinylated anti-mouse IgG. Analysis of immunoreactive deposits for Aβ was done using the public domain program NIH image (version 1.61; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/index.html), by defining a region of interest and setting a threshold to discriminate nonspecific staining. The percentage of surface area covered by Aβ immunoreactivity was used to measure plaque load. Compact deposits were measured through Congo red staining (Accustain Amyloid Staining kit; Sigma-Aldrich). Sections were incubated in an alkaline sodium chloride solution for 20 minutes and incubated in alkaline Congo red solution. Congo red staining was evaluated with a light microscope. The percentage of surface area that was stained with Congo red was used to measure Congo red–positive deposits with NIH image analysis software (v. 1.61; http://rsb.info.nih.gov/nih-image/index.html). Both for 4G8 staining and Congo red staining, 2 regions were analyzed: an area of parietal cortex, comprising layers I–VI, and an area of the hippocampal formation, including stratum oriens, pyramidal layer, stratum radiatum, and the dentate gyrus.
Statistics. Statistical analyses were performed blind with respect to genotype and treatment. Results were analyzed with 2-tailed Student’s t test (pairwise comparisons) or 2-way ANOVA with post-hoc correction (multiple comparisons). Results were expressed as mean ± SEM. The level of significance was set for P < 0.05.
We thank Karen Hsiao-Ashe (University of Minnesota and The Mayo Clinic) for providing the APP mice, Karen Duff (Columbia University) for providing the PS1 mice, and Archana Narasanna and Fortunato Battaglia for assistance with western blot analysis and electrophysiological experiments, respectively. This work was supported by NIH National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) (NS049442) and Institute for the Study of Aging (ISOA).
Nonstandard abbreviations used: Aβ, amyloid-β peptide; AD, Alzheimer disease; APP, amyloid precursor protein; BDA-410, (2S)-N-(1S)-1-[(S)-Hydroxy(3-oxo-2-phenyl-1-cyclopropen-1-yl)methyl]-2-methylpropyl-2-benzenesulfonylamino-4-methylpentanamide; BST, basal synaptic transmission; CREB, cAMP regulatory element-binding protein; E64, trans-epoxysuccinyl-l-leucylamido (4-guanidino)-butane; fEPSP, field excitatory postsynaptic potential; LTP, long-term potentiation; mEPSC, miniature excitatory postsynaptic current; pCREB, phosphorylated CREB; PS1, presenilin 1; RAWM, radial-arm water maze.
Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.
Citation for this article:J. Clin. Invest.118:2796–2807 (2008). doi:10.1172/JCI34254