Effects of the amylin analogue pramlintide on hepatic glucagon responses and intermediary metabolism in type 1 diabetic subjects

L Ørskov, B Nyholm, KY Hove, CH Gravholt… - Diabetic …, 1999 - Wiley Online Library
L Ørskov, B Nyholm, KY Hove, CH Gravholt, N Møller, O Schmitz
Diabetic medicine, 1999Wiley Online Library
Aims Hepatic glycogen stores have been shown to be depleted, and glucagon stimulated
hepatic glucose production reduced, in Type 1 diabetic subjects. Co‐administration of
amylin and insulin has been shown to replete hepatic glycogen stores in diabetic animal
models. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of amylin replacement on
hepatic glucagon responsiveness in humans. Methods Thirteen Type 1 diabetic men were
studied in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study after 4 weeks of …
Summary
Aims Hepatic glycogen stores have been shown to be depleted, and glucagon stimulated hepatic glucose production reduced, in Type 1 diabetic subjects. Co‐administration of amylin and insulin has been shown to replete hepatic glycogen stores in diabetic animal models. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of amylin replacement on hepatic glucagon responsiveness in humans.
Methods Thirteen Type 1 diabetic men were studied in a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over study after 4 weeks of subcutaneous pramlintide (30 μg q.i.d.) or placebo administration. Following an overnight fast, plasma glucose was kept above 5 mmol/l (baseline 210–240 min) with an insulin infusion rate of 0.25 mU.kg–1.min–1. To control portal glucagon levels, somatostatin was infused at a rate of 200 μg/h. Basal growth hormone (2 ng.kg–1.min–1) and glucagon (0.7 ng.kg–1.min–1) were replaced. Glucagon infusion was increased to 2.1 ng.kg–1.min–1 at 240–360 min (step 1) and to 4.2 ng.kg–1.min–1 at 360–420 min (step 2).
Results Baseline plasma glucose (5.59 ± 0.16 vs. 5.67 ± 0.25 mmo/l) and endogenous glucose production (EGP) (1.32 ± 0.22 vs. 1.20 ± 0.13 mg.kg–1. min–1) were similar and the response to glucagon was unaffected by pramlintide (glucose: step 1; 6.01 ± 0.31 vs. 5.94 ± 0.38 mmo/l, step 2; 6.00 ± 0.37 vs. 5.96 ± 0.50 mmol/l, EGP: step 1; 1.91 ± 0.18 vs. 1.83 ± 0.15 mg.kg–1.min–1, step 2; 2.08 ± 0.17 vs. 1.96 ± 0.16 ng.kg–1.min–1, pramlintide vs. placebo). Glucose disposal rates were similar at baseline (2.44 ± 0.13 vs. 2.28 ± 0.09 mg.kg–1.min–1, pramlintide vs. placebo) as well as during the glucagon challenge (P‐values all > 0.2).
Conclusions Co‐administration of pramlintide and insulin to Type 1 diabetic subjects for 4 weeks does not change the plasma glucose or endogenous glucose production response to a glucagon challenge, following an overnight fast. In addition, pramlintide administration does not appear to alter insulin‐mediated glucose disposal.
Wiley Online Library