Gene expression profiles of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

K Konishi, KF Gibson, KO Lindell… - American journal of …, 2009 - atsjournals.org
K Konishi, KF Gibson, KO Lindell, TJ Richards, Y Zhang, R Dhir, M Bisceglia, S Gilbert
American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 2009atsjournals.org
Rationale: The molecular mechanisms underlying acute exacerbations of idiopathic
pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are poorly understood. We studied the global gene expression
signature of acute exacerbations of IPF. Objectives: To understand the gene expression
patterns of acute exacerbations of IPF. Methods: RNA was extracted from 23 stable IPF
lungs, 8 IPF lungs with acute exacerbation (IPF-AEx), and 15 control lungs and used for
hybridization on Agilent gene expression microarrays. Functional analysis of genes was …
Rationale: The molecular mechanisms underlying acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) are poorly understood. We studied the global gene expression signature of acute exacerbations of IPF.
Objectives: To understand the gene expression patterns of acute exacerbations of IPF.
Methods: RNA was extracted from 23 stable IPF lungs, 8 IPF lungs with acute exacerbation (IPF-AEx), and 15 control lungs and used for hybridization on Agilent gene expression microarrays. Functional analysis of genes was performed with Spotfire and Genomica. Gene validations for MMP1, MMP7, AGER, DEFA1–3, COL1A2, and CCNA2 were performed by real-time quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Immunohistochemistry and in situ terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase dUTP nick end-labeling assays were performed on the same tissues used for the microarray. ELISA for α-defensins was performed on plasma from control subjects, patients with stable IPF, and patients with IPF-AEx.
Measurements and Main Results: Gene expression patterns in IPF-AEx and IPF samples were similar for the genes that distinguish IPF from control lungs. Five hundred and seventy-nine genes were differentially expressed (false discovery rate < 5%) between stable IPF and IPF-AEx. Functional analysis of these genes did not indicate any evidence of an infectious or overwhelming inflammatory etiology. CCNA2 and α-defensins were among the most up-regulated genes. CCNA2 and α-defensin protein levels were also higher and localized to the epithelium of IPF-AEx, where widespread apoptosis was also detected. α-Defensin protein levels were increased in the peripheral blood of patients with IPF-AEx.
Conclusions: Our results indicate that IPF-AEx is characterized by enhanced epithelial injury and proliferation, as reflected by increases in CCNA2 and α-defensins and apoptosis of epithelium. The concomitant increase in α-defensins in the peripheral blood and lungs may suggest their use as biomarkers for this disorder.
ATS Journals