Prognostic impact of trisomies of chromosomes 10, 17, and 5 among children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and high hyperdiploidy (> 50 chromosomes)

NA Heerema, HN Sather, MG Sensel… - Journal of Clinical …, 2000 - ascopubs.org
NA Heerema, HN Sather, MG Sensel, T Zhang, RJ Hutchinson, JB Nachman, BJ Lange…
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2000ascopubs.org
PURPOSE: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and high hyperdiploidy (> 50
chromosomes) have improved outcome compared with other ALL patients. We sought to
identify cytogenetic features that would predict differences in outcome within this low-risk
subset of ALL patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-hyperdiploid ALL patients (N=
480) were enrolled between 1988 and 1995 on Children's Cancer Group (CCG) trials.
Karyotypes were determined by conventional banding. Treatment outcome was analyzed by …
PURPOSE: Children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and high hyperdiploidy (> 50 chromosomes) have improved outcome compared with other ALL patients. We sought to identify cytogenetic features that would predict differences in outcome within this low-risk subset of ALL patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: High-hyperdiploid ALL patients (N = 480) were enrolled between 1988 and 1995 on Children’s Cancer Group (CCG) trials. Karyotypes were determined by conventional banding. Treatment outcome was analyzed by life-table methods.
RESULTS: Patients with 54 to 58 chromosomes had better outcome than patients with 51 to 53 or 59 to 68 chromosomes (P = .0002). Patients with a trisomy of chromosome 10 (P < .0001), chromosome 17 (P = .0002), or chromosome 18 (P = .004) had significantly improved outcome compared with their counterparts who lacked the given trisomy. Patients with a trisomy of chromosome 5 had worse outcome than patients lacking this trisomy (P = .02). Patients with trisomies of both chromosomes 10 and 17 had better outcome than those with a trisomy of chromosome 10 (P = .09), a trisomy of chromosome 17 (P = .01), or neither trisomy (P < .0001). Multivariate analysis indicated that trisomy of chromosome 10 (P = .001) was the most significant prognostic factor for high-hyperdiploid patients, yet trisomy of chromosome 17 (P = .02) or chromosome 5 (P = .01) and modal chromosome number (P = .02) also had significant multivariate effects.
CONCLUSION: Trisomy of chromosomes 10 and 17 as well as modal chromosome number 54 to 58 identify subgroups of patients with high-hyperdiploid ALL who have a better outcome than high-hyperdiploid patients who lack these cytogenetic features. Trisomy of chromosome 5 confers poorer outcome among high-hyperdiploid patients.
ASCO Publications