[HTML][HTML] The Pain in Neuropathy Study (PiNS): a cross-sectional observational study determining the somatosensory phenotype of painful and painless diabetic …

AC Themistocleous, JD Ramirez, PR Shillo, JG Lees… - Pain, 2016 - journals.lww.com
AC Themistocleous, JD Ramirez, PR Shillo, JG Lees, D Selvarajah, C Orengo, S Tesfaye
Pain, 2016journals.lww.com
Disabling neuropathic pain (NeuP) is a common sequel of diabetic peripheral neuropathy
(DPN). We aimed to characterise the sensory phenotype of patients with and without NeuP,
assess screening tools for NeuP, and relate DPN severity to NeuP. The Pain in Neuropathy
Study (PiNS) is an observational cross-sectional multicentre study. A total of 191 patients
with DPN underwent neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing, nerve
conduction studies, and skin biopsy for intraepidermal nerve fibre density assessment. A set …
Abstract
Disabling neuropathic pain (NeuP) is a common sequel of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN). We aimed to characterise the sensory phenotype of patients with and without NeuP, assess screening tools for NeuP, and relate DPN severity to NeuP. The Pain in Neuropathy Study (PiNS) is an observational cross-sectional multicentre study. A total of 191 patients with DPN underwent neurological examination, quantitative sensory testing, nerve conduction studies, and skin biopsy for intraepidermal nerve fibre density assessment. A set of questionnaires assessed the presence of pain, pain intensity, pain distribution, and the psychological and functional impact of pain. Patients were divided according to the presence of DPN, and thereafter according to the presence and severity of NeuP. The DN4 questionnaire demonstrated excellent sensitivity (88%) and specificity (93%) in screening for NeuP. There was a positive correlation between greater neuropathy severity (r 5 0.39, P, 0.01), higher HbA1c (r 5 0.21, P, 0.01), and the presence (and severity) of NeuP. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy sensory phenotype is characterised by hyposensitivity to applied stimuli that was more marked in the moderate/severe NeuP group than in the mild NeuP or no NeuP groups. Brush-evoked allodynia was present in only those with NeuP (15%); the paradoxical heat sensation did not discriminate between those with (40%) and without (41.3%) NeuP. The “irritable nociceptor” subgroup could only be applied to a minority of patients (6.3%) with NeuP. This study provides a firm basis to rationalise further phenotyping of painful DPN, for instance, stratification of patients with DPN for analgesic drug trials.
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins