Impact of Systemic Antibiotics on Staphylococcus aureus Colonization and Recurrent Skin Infection

PG Hogan, M Rodriguez, AM Spenner… - Clinical Infectious …, 2018 - academic.oup.com
PG Hogan, M Rodriguez, AM Spenner, JM Brenneisen, MG Boyle, ML Sullivan, SA Fritz
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2018academic.oup.com
Background Staphylococcus aureus colonization poses risk for subsequent skin and soft
tissue infection (SSTI). We hypothesized that including systemic antibiotics in the
management of S. aureus SSTI, in conjunction with incision and drainage, would reduce S.
aureus colonization and incidence of recurrent infection. Methods We prospectively
evaluated 383 children with S. aureus SSTI requiring incision and drainage and S. aureus
colonization in the anterior nares, axillae, or inguinal folds at baseline screening. Systemic …
Background
Staphylococcus aureus colonization poses risk for subsequent skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI). We hypothesized that including systemic antibiotics in the management of S. aureus SSTI, in conjunction with incision and drainage, would reduce S. aureus colonization and incidence of recurrent infection.
Methods
We prospectively evaluated 383 children with S. aureus SSTI requiring incision and drainage and S. aureus colonization in the anterior nares, axillae, or inguinal folds at baseline screening. Systemic antibiotic prescribing at the point of care was recorded. Repeat colonization sampling was performed within 3 months (median, 38 days; interquartile range, 22–50 days) in 357 participants. Incidence of recurrent infection was ascertained for up to 1 year.
Results
Participants prescribed guideline-recommended empiric antibiotics for purulent SSTI were less likely to remain colonized at follow-up sampling (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], .30–.79) and less likely to have recurrent SSTI (aHR, 0.57; 95% CI, .34–.94) than those not receiving guideline-recommended empiric antibiotics for their SSTI. Additionally, participants remaining colonized at repeat sampling were more likely to report a recurrent infection over 12 months (aHR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.69–3.31). Clindamycin was more effective than trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) in eradicating S. aureus colonization (44% vs 57% remained colonized, P = .03) and preventing recurrent SSTI (31% vs 47% experienced recurrence, P = .008).
Conclusions
Systemic antibiotics, as part of acute SSTI management, impact S. aureus colonization, contributing to a decreased incidence of recurrent SSTI. The mechanism by which clindamycin differentially affects colonization and recurrent SSTI compared to TMP-SMX warrants further study.
Oxford University Press